At the
start of this week I run the array analysis from the two different groups separately.
This gave already a much better quality rapport which could be used for further
analysis.
The first
dataset (baseline VS experimental group) was not yet completely good. Some
outliners should still be erase from the dataset.
In this NUSE the data of the baseline and the experimental group is shown. There are still lots of data which are far from the median
|
Even though in the NUSE plot, there is a clearly marge in the PCA1/2 (first PCA plot). ALso in PCA2/3 (second PCA plot) a marge can be seen. This all afther normalization. Still lots of outliners.
|
In this cluster dendogram the different group are cluster togeheter, this afther normalization. Still some outliner which we might consider to exclude.
|
From the
second dataset (acute malaria VS treated malaria) only one subjected, treated
9, was a outliner. So also this dataset I had to run without this subject. The
only disadvantage would be that there is no baseline for this group.
At the end
of this week I came together with Lars and his students and we discuss our
dataset, rapport and the statistical analysis. Lars would help everyone with
writing a script for the statistical analyses. He wrote it in the weekend of
this week and at the start of next week we will discuss the scripts.
This week I
also joined the first science caffé, where a lecture about statistical analysis
was given.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten